Skip to content

Affiliate Disclosure

AI Prompt Gear may in the future use affiliate links on selected pages. If that happens, the site may earn a commission when a reader clicks through and completes a qualifying action with a third-party provider.

Affiliate links are not currently intended to replace editorial judgment. If a page discusses a product, tool, model, platform, or service, the page should still explain the practical fit, limitations, tradeoffs, and situations where the option is not the right choice.

How affiliate relationships should work here

Section titled “How affiliate relationships should work here”
  • Affiliate relationships should not quietly determine editorial conclusions.
  • Not every product or service mentioned on the site will necessarily use an affiliate link.
  • Pages should remain useful even when no affiliate relationship exists.

If affiliate links are introduced, readers should be able to understand the relationship before they make a decision. Disclosure may appear on this page, in the site footer, and near the relevant link or section when the context requires it. The goal is not to hide commercial relationships in legal text. The goal is to make the relationship clear enough that readers can evaluate the page with proper context.

Affiliate use should follow these boundaries:

BoundaryPractical meaning
Editorial independenceA commission should not decide the recommendation.
Clear labelingReaders should not have to guess whether a link is commercial.
Limited useAffiliate links should be relevant to the reader’s task, not scattered across unrelated pages.
Useful content firstThe page should stand on its own even if all affiliate links are removed.
Link or mention typeReader expectationRequired editorial posture
Plain editorial mentionThe vendor is discussed because it helps explain the topic.No commercial relationship is implied.
Affiliate linkThe page may earn a commission if the reader buys.The recommendation must still be justified by fit and evidence.
Sponsored placementThe sponsor relationship is visible to the reader.Sponsorship should not control independent editorial conclusions.
Tool comparisonVendors are compared by operating criteria.Missing vendors should not be treated as rejected vendors.
Prompt or workflow templateThe value is the reader’s adapted workflow.A commercial link should not become the reason a workflow exists.

This site is intended to cover workflows, tools, evaluation systems, and related buying decisions. Because some of those subjects can overlap with commercial programs, explicit disclosure is important for reader trust.

Affiliate disclosure does not turn any page into purchasing advice. Readers should still verify pricing, contract terms, security requirements, compliance fit, support coverage, data-handling terms, and implementation needs with the provider before buying or deploying a tool.

Affiliate relationships should never make a page harder to evaluate. If a page includes a commercial link, the reader should still be able to identify the practical problem, the relevant workflow, the tradeoffs, and the reasons a tool may not fit. A strong page should make it easier to say no to a product when the product does not match the reader’s operating context.

The site should also keep commercial links out of purely informational sections where the reader is only trying to understand a concept, policy, or failure mode. Links are most useful when they appear near comparison criteria, implementation constraints, or next-step research paths. They are least useful when they interrupt a checklist, make a policy page feel promotional, or encourage a decision before the reader has enough evidence.